Z47
September 22, 2021

Convertible round vs priced equity round?

What should founders be raising and what's the market standard? Avnish Bajaj & Rajinder Balaraman discuss the thought process behind this decision for both the founder and investor. Tune in to find out.

Rajinder:

Should I be raising a convertible round or a priced equity round, what’s market standard?

Avnish:

Market standard versus my answer are different. So, market standard in the US for seed has become a convertible round. And we do it also, we follow the market, we can’t change the market. My personal view, bad idea.

Let’s take both the investor view and the founder view, the investor view is, I don’t know the captable of the company, I don’t know how much I’m going to own—and therefore I’m always going to be a little less committed to your company. And wherever we have done these convertible notes, at least we have intended to put in lower cheques then we would have otherwise, if it was a price round. Because I’m in the business of risk and reward, you are telling me at a point in time, which is today, to price my round at a point in the future, it’s just unfair.

So, for me as an investor, we do it because it's market and we say if it's working we will increase our ownership later, but it misaligns risk and reward. Today’s risk is being priced at tomorrow’s reward and that’s not how investors think.

Interestingly, I believe it’s a bad idea for the founders because the founders get a fall sense of comfort. If I have a very high cap in some of these rounds, most founders just like the investors are, they are thinking at the cap level, they are thinking my next level is going to come there, they are spending money according to that, they are building their next round backwards, thinking according to that.

And if they don’t hit those milestones and the round ends up much lower, they suddenly own a lot less of a company than they thought they were and I think that's not a good place to be in. so, I think even though it has become market, my view is, but by the way it's market only for seed. I think for non-seed most people, I advise the companies don’t do a next round convert, wherever you can do a priced round.

Founders tend to balance greed and fear and they tend to want to do convertible through the next round, then my advice always is, ok if you are doing a convertible at least put a floor to it, obviously the investor will ask for a cap and don’t raise too much. Because the point remains the same, this is a business of knowing your captable and in a convertible you don’t know it. And therefore, people are not as committed as you think they are or either on the risk side or on the reward side.

For more information, write to us: namaste@Z47.com.
Stay connected with Z47.

Watch more such podcasts

Z47
July 2, 2026

How a Wall Street analyst quit everything to build a billion dollar business | Country Delight | Unstarted

Z47
June 25, 2026

Running two profitable unicorns in India | Asish Mohapatra, OfBusiness | Unstarted

Z47
June 18, 2026

What sports taught the Head of Spotify India about building a business | Unstarted

Z47
September 22, 2021

Convertible round vs priced equity round?

Article
Listen to article

What should founders be raising and what's the market standard? Avnish Bajaj & Rajinder Balaraman discuss the thought process behind this decision for both the founder and investor. Tune in to find out.

Rajinder:

Should I be raising a convertible round or a priced equity round, what’s market standard?

Avnish:

Market standard versus my answer are different. So, market standard in the US for seed has become a convertible round. And we do it also, we follow the market, we can’t change the market. My personal view, bad idea.

Let’s take both the investor view and the founder view, the investor view is, I don’t know the captable of the company, I don’t know how much I’m going to own—and therefore I’m always going to be a little less committed to your company. And wherever we have done these convertible notes, at least we have intended to put in lower cheques then we would have otherwise, if it was a price round. Because I’m in the business of risk and reward, you are telling me at a point in time, which is today, to price my round at a point in the future, it’s just unfair.

So, for me as an investor, we do it because it's market and we say if it's working we will increase our ownership later, but it misaligns risk and reward. Today’s risk is being priced at tomorrow’s reward and that’s not how investors think.

Interestingly, I believe it’s a bad idea for the founders because the founders get a fall sense of comfort. If I have a very high cap in some of these rounds, most founders just like the investors are, they are thinking at the cap level, they are thinking my next level is going to come there, they are spending money according to that, they are building their next round backwards, thinking according to that.

And if they don’t hit those milestones and the round ends up much lower, they suddenly own a lot less of a company than they thought they were and I think that's not a good place to be in. so, I think even though it has become market, my view is, but by the way it's market only for seed. I think for non-seed most people, I advise the companies don’t do a next round convert, wherever you can do a priced round.

Founders tend to balance greed and fear and they tend to want to do convertible through the next round, then my advice always is, ok if you are doing a convertible at least put a floor to it, obviously the investor will ask for a cap and don’t raise too much. Because the point remains the same, this is a business of knowing your captable and in a convertible you don’t know it. And therefore, people are not as committed as you think they are or either on the risk side or on the reward side.

We are excited about the innovation and growth opportunities in this sector.

If you are considering building in the footwear space, we’d love to chat.
Drop us a line at consumer@matrixpartners.in

Learnt something new? Follow us!

Vs NIFTY 500
+9.1%
Since Jan 2024
USD/INR
₹95.19
▲ +0.6%
Daily change • 1 Ju1 2025
128.1
▲ +28.1%
Since Jan 2024
NIFTY 500
129.1
▲ +19.0%
Since Jan 2024

Index Performance

+28.1%
Since Jan 2024
NIFTY 500
+19.0%
Since Jan 2024

Z47^fortyseven is up +23.9% since its January 2024 base date, versus Nifty 500's +18.4%, ahead by 550 bps.

The cohort moved +4.7% over the month versus Nifty 500's +2.5%, leading by 220 bps.

Anchored in domestic demand and rising digital adoption, the cohort remained resilient amid global headwinds.

Consumer Tech was the best-performing sector at +9.2% last month, driven by sustained growth in consumer demand and strength in consumer-internet platforms.

Largest Constituents  ·  The Names That Anchor The Index

1.
Eternal
Quick-commerce leadership and continued investment
▲ +12.8%
2.
Groww
Broking market-share gains and margin-funding growth.
▲ +10.4%
3.
Lenskart
Store densification and margin expansion.
▲ +2.4%

Top Gainers  ·  Key Drivers

1 MONTH RETURN
1.
CarTrade
Auto-marketplace dominance and a cash-rich balance sheet.
▲ +59.4%
2.
 Amagi Media Labs
Profitability turnaround and AI-led cloud media adoption.
▲ +31.4%

Top Laggards  ·  Key Drivers

1 MONTH RETURN
1.
Fractal Analytics
Enterprise AI spending trends and post-listing share supply.
▼ -10.8%
2.
MedPlus Health
Pharmacy-margin pressure and competitive intensity.
▼ -6.6%

Key Themes  ·  Latest Results

In Q4FY26, Z47^fortyseven's cohort grew top line ~39% YoY, more than 3x the broad market's ~12% growth.

Operating leverage lifted net margins around 500 bps into positive territory, even as broad-market net margins remained roughly flat.

With 40 of 47 companies now profitable, the cohort reflects a broader shift toward profitable growth over growth at any cost.

AI adoption runs deeper across this cohort than in the broader market, with companies using it to drive growth and reshape demand, not just improve efficiency.

Cash generation is increasingly defining the winners, enabling market leaders like Eternal, CarTrade, and PB Fintech to fund acquisitions and expansion from their own balance sheets.

Market & Macro Context

The cohort saw several block deals this month, including sizeable stake sales in Lenskart, Delhivery, Honasa, and Shadowfax.

Ownership continues to shift from foreign investors to domestic institutions, creating a more durable shareholder base.

AI remained the defining technology investment theme, driving capital deployment across both private and public markets.

IPO Takeaway · Kissht

Listed May 2026

A modest listing pop followed by strong post-listing gains reinforced the market's preference for asset quality and disciplined underwriting over pure loan-book growth.

The listing helped reset perceptions around unsecured lending, creating a constructive valuation anchor for the issuers that follow.

The buyer mix was a notable positive — strong participation from long-only domestic institutions supporting a durable post-listing ownership base.

Net Read

Fundamentals continued to strengthen across the cohort, with growth, margins, and cash generation improving in tandem.

Performance dispersion widened, with profitability and earnings quality increasingly distinguishing the strongest performers from the rest.

Disclaimer

Z47^fortyseven is published for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, or any offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell securities. Index performance is historical and should not be construed as indicative of future results.

Explore the live index
Read Previous Article On Land & Expand
Read Next Article On Land & Expand